🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.